Despite what many may believe I am regular listener to Sean Hannity’s radio show. This does not/nor should imply that I agree with everything he says. Recently on the issue of guns and the debt ceiling, he’s had three “back pocket arguments” that he whips out to beat back callers who take an opposing view. The commute home is not far enough to justify calling in, so I thought I would post my potential responses below.
1- We protect our money, our politicians and our Hollywood elite with guns….why can’t/shouldn’t we put guns in our schools to protect our most valuable assets….our children? I love how he phrases this because it begs for the caller to respond with “why we shouldn’t”. This meme has been on his show for over a week now, and it’s not much of a surprise it got turned into an NRA ad.
My answer: Sure we should look at that. If a community wants armed guards in their schools not only should they be allowed to, but many locations already allow it, and more are considering it. Although there may be some people who completely oppose this idea, Obama isn’t one of them, the President has only said that it shouldn’t be the only solution. In fact his recent proposals included money for more School Resource Officers (AKA Cops with guns in schools) and was supported by the National Education Association.
So- while you can debate its potential effectiveness, or even some of the details (Resource Officers vs arming the staff), you really can’t honestly portray this as a President against the idea of protecting our children. These decisions are being made at the local level, something the Republicans espouse and the principle is being supported by the federal government.
2- New York’s new gun law calls for limiting magazines to 7 rounds is horrible. Hannity’s example du jour about why this is a bad idea is the woman who recently had to shoot an intruder 5 times and he still got away. Sean then will go on to ask what would happen if there had been two intruders or even three? Sarcastically talking about how she would have to ask them to wait while she changes magazines. I heard this story at least three times this week as I drove home.
My answer: The question would be a lot more valid if Hannity’s immediate reaction to people limiting high-capacity magazines earlier had not been based on a theory that it “would do no good”. His position at the time was that changing a magazine was not hard. In fact, he could do it seconds (or less). Of course this was because he is a responsible gun owner who knows his weapons. So which is it Sean? Is it so easy that even a deranged person could change magazines and still inflict mass carnage, or is it so difficult that reducing magazine sizes puts lawful Americans at risk. I believe you could argue either point….but not both. Caveat the NY Law that allows for larger magazines but only if they aren’t all the way filled up is a recipe for unintended consequences. and should be changed.
3- Obama is a debt ceiling hypocrite. Hannity likes to run the audio clip of Senator Obama arguing against the executive request raise the debt ceiling in 2006 and asks any guests of the more liberal persuasion if the President is inconsistent in his thinking. This only gets the guests to move off on a tangent and not address Sean’s question leaving him with the apparent high ground.
My answer: Yes….Absolutely…He is inconsistent….This is an undeniable Flip Flop. The next question would then be; Who was he arguing with? Turns out it was a Republican President that wanted the debt ceiling raised. It was raised (many times) with “yea” votes coming from the likes of John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Mitch McConnell . This isn’t about principles it’s about a Congress (any Congress) that has the power of the purse, yet seeks to paint the executive branch as the root of our problems. Both sides do it, which is bad. Worse, are those who pretend it doesn’t happen and use selective examples to stir the passions of their base.
These are just some examples of how the infotainers in our country whip people up into a frenzy about “the other guys”. Both sides have these people who make money pandering to the base and they are equally at fault for the toxic political environment. Rational thought, unfortunately, doesn’t get the ratings on TV and doesn’t get “shared” on Facebook.